Wednesday, September 2, 2020

The development of the legend of King Arthur Research Paper

The advancement of the legend of King Arthur - Research Paper Example He is thought to have battled during the Dark Ages warrior of the Celts. The legendary structure that followed his history depended on his reign in the Dark Age. Notwithstanding, there is no regular understanding that the legend existed either as an individual or as composite of a few people. The connection among Saxons and Celts in Britain has helped creators to clarify the improvement of the legend (Castleden 226). He got well known for during when there was social agitation and unpredictable good solidness in Britain. He was the main military pioneer whom individuals thought could bring peace back in the popular heaven of the west. Ruler Arthur had relationship with Queen Guinevere, who supposedly engaged in extramarital relations with Lancelot (Castleden, 229). Lancelot was perhaps the best knight and an individual from the Knights of the Round Table. The story of King Arthur recounts his fatal clash with his nephew and child Mordred. He lord was turning down son’s journey for the Holy Grail. Ruler Arthur’ stories created during the fifth century when Britons were battling Saxon development to the heaven of the west. The Saxons were constrained back to the Cornwall and Wales, and their domain became what is by and by known as England. The Welsh portrayal of King Arthur makes reference to a remote chief who helped Britons to hold Saxons under control. The Welsh annals clarify that the Saxons had no goals with the endeavors of King Arthur (Caerleon.net). Historia Britonum is one of the main references to how the legend created and is a gathering of Welsh Chronicles in 830 AD. The accounts depict King Arthur as a warrior who conquered twelve fights during his rule. The legend battled the battler of Mount Badon and City if the Legion to referenced a couple of the fights he helped Britain to win (Caerleon.net). Geoffrey of Monmouth likewise assisted with creating King Arthur’s stories. Geoffrey describes King Arthur as a

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Mathematics Is Useful Free Essays

Arithmetic Mathematics is Useful Mathematics can profit everybody in any sort of way. Science is likewise a need. From adjusting a checkbook to a straightforward round of poker, you are utilizing your math abilities all over. We will compose a custom paper test on Arithmetic Is Useful or on the other hand any comparable subject just for you Request Now As a clerk, I utilize my aptitudes each time I go to work. Despite the fact that the machine tells me what change to give back, and what is the all out expense of the considerable number of items, I need to utilize my aptitudes to check out the change. I additionally utilize my abilities when discounting things, placing in coupons, and how much a sack of natural product or meat gauges. I am presently searching for another telephone for my telephone plan I have now, I’m utilizing my math abilities to figure how much my telephone will be on the off chance that I do an exchange. Some more instances of how math is helpful in regular day to day existence are ascertaining a tip, utilizing a formula, playing pool, assembling a deck, and contributing for retirement. Arithmetic is Important Mathematics is basic for science, designing, and research. Likewise mathematic capability is required for some employments these days. Doing science shows examples of critical thinking and understanding that move to other information spaces. The profession I picked is the Accounting field, and as you most likely are aware, Accountants manage cash. Arithmetic and bookkeeping go connected at the hip, however not as interweaved as individuals may accept. The reason for having a solid numerical foundation is to build an accountant’s intellectual capacity. A wide range of bookkeeping exercises require the utilization science or numerical standards. End Understanding what math capacities are vital can assist people with getting ready for this business procedure. Bookkeeping exercises are brimming with essential and propelled counts. These are frequently important to comprehend what data needs to go into a company’s general record. Numerous computations require fundamental math standards. Different occasions, in any case, numerous mind boggling issues may require the utilization of various figurings. It is critical to have essential math and variable based math abilities to finish these errands and report exact budgetary data. References Chartier, T. (December 2012) Math is Everywhere: Applications of Finite Math Retrieved March 26, 2013 from https://www. udemy. com/math-is-wherever uses of-limited math/Hobart D. (2007, February 21) What Is the Real Use of Mathematics In Real Life? Recovered March 26, 2013 from http://www. blurtit. com/q806258. html The most effective method to refer to Mathematics Is Useful, Papers

Paper on Sq3R

SQ3R The SQ3R procedure (which represents Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review) was created by Robinson (1961) to give an organized way to deal with understudies to utilize when examining content material. This procedure has demonstrated to be viable and flexible and can undoubtedly be incorporated into many substance regions and across grade levels. Understudies create successful examination propensities by taking part in the pre-perusing, during-perusing, and post-perusing steps of this procedure. The SQ3R proficiency procedure helps improve perception and maintenance of data. It is metacognitive in nature in that it is a self-checking process. 1.Survey (1 moment): Before starting perusing glance through the entire part. See what the headings are †the significant ones and the subheadings; progressive structures appear to be especially simple for our minds to hook onto †check for early on and rundown passages, references, and so on. Oppose perusing now, yet check whether you can recognize 3 to 6 significant thoughts in the section. 2. Inquiry (generally under 30 seconds): Ask yourself what this section is about: What is the issue that this part is attempting to reply? Or on the other hand †along the interest lines †What question do I have that this section may help answer?Repeat this procedure with every subsection of the part, also, transforming each heading into an inquiry. 3. Peruse (more slow for a few of us than others! ): Read each segment in turn searching for the response to the inquiry proposed by the heading! This is dynamic perusing and requires focus so get yourself a spot and time where you can think. 4. Discuss/expound (about a moment): Say to yourself (I do this for all to hear so I need to examine where I don't humiliate myself) or record (I once in a while do this in the edges of the book itself ) a key expression that summarizes the significant purpose of the segment and answers the question.It is essential to utilize yo ur own words, not simply duplicate an expression from the book. Research shows that we recollect our own (dynamic) associations superior to ones given to us (aloof), surely that our own orders are commonly superior to the best prefab chains of command. 5. Audit (under 5 minutes): After rehashing stages 2-4 for each area you have a rundown of key expressions that gives a kind of blueprint to the section. Test yourself by concealing the key expressions and checking whether you can review them. Do this privilege after you wrap up the part. On the off chance that you can't remember one of your major oints, that is a segment you have to rehash. Numerous understudies don’t realize how to study, and this methodology is an ideal method to support them. It functions admirably in many substance zones with an assortment of sorts of content. It is suggested that the instructor tell the understudies the best way to experience the means. In the fifth grade science exercise discovered later in this section, this system gives the structure expected to build up an idea map. WORKS CITED Robinson, Francis Pleasant. (1970) Effective investigation (fourth ed. ). New York: Harper ; Row. Halawa, O 2010 November 12, SQ3R Reading Strategy, 08/12/10, http://www. premisemarketing. com/work/approach/

Friday, August 21, 2020

Motivating Employees as the First Step to the Organisation Growth

Presentation The accomplishment of any association relies entirely upon the commitment of the representatives. Representatives are the most basic component of an association, and in this manner directors should put the requirements of the laborers in front of theirs so as to guarantee smooth running of an association. Rousing workers is the initial step to guaranteeing that they give top level augmentation to the development of an organisation.Advertising We will compose a custom paper test on Motivating Employees as the First Step to the Organization Growth explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More There are different methods of inspiring representatives, which incorporate great pay rates and compensations, advancement, acknowledgment and fulfilling, administration style, and off the clock times among different advantages. In any case, various societies direct various methods of propelling workers. Assorted variety on the planet societies straightforwardly identifies wi th contrasts in the authoritative societies in various pieces of the world. For example, the obsessive worker Japanese culture is not quite the same as the American working society of just about eight hours per day. Consequently, a Japanese representative is roused in an alternate style from an American worker, who doesn't work for extended periods. Workers are people as are the hierarchical chiefs; in this manner, supervisors ought to consistently regard their privileges at all expense for the advantages of the authoritative achievement. As per the worldwide work arrangements, representatives reserve the privilege to request better working conditions, and if not gave by the business, they can take the issue to the modern courts. In any case, a few countries don't hold fast to that legitimate prerequisite; rather, they have their own work laws that deny representatives of the option to request better working conditions. Such countries put a lot of thoughtfulness regarding financial development, which they accomplish while holding poor GDPs for workers are monetarily poor. Among such countries are China and the UAE that weight on employees’ commitment while then again they pay low compensations and deny them the option to request more from their bosses. Writing Review According to Lipman (2013), an administration and corporate life author at Forbes, there are five different ways to rouse and five different ways to de-spur representatives. Variables that rouse workers incorporate adjusting employee’s monetary interests with the exhibition of the association. Ignorant (2008) notes, chiefs ought to comprehend that an association accomplishes great execution from employees’ commitment, and in this manner the supervisory crew should offer motivators for workers’ commitment. Lipman (203) feels that this move would permit representatives to feel some portion of the company’s achievement and consequently rouse them to work more enthus iastically later on. What's more, supervisors should look into the future development of the employees’ profession. Managers who mind about the bearing of profession of their laborers causes them to feel motivated.Advertising Looking for article on business financial aspects? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More According to the Kuwait Times (2013), a large portion of representatives in Kuwait offer vocation advancement programs that propel workers and cause them to feel some portion of developing associations. It is intriguing to realize that associations that offer vocation advancement projects to their representatives offer approach to development and quality creation, and henceforth are more serious than those that don't offer such chances to their workers (Kuwait Times 2013). Willmore (2009) is of the feeling that supervisors and businesses ought to maintain work-life balance in their employees’ lives. This fa ctor reminds the businesses that representatives are people with more prominent life obligations past their commitment to the associations that they work for, and in this way their lives ought to be regarded. Doyle (2005) includes that regarding employees’ lives necessitates that they have sufficient opportunity to lead different duties that lie in front of their lives. As per Podmoroff (2005), this move may show up as a little motion to an association, however it has an astounding effect on the general development of an association that relies upon the commitment of the representatives. Kehoe and Alston (2007) accentuate that representatives value working with a business who comprehends their lives past the extent of the association. For example, administrators ought to send agents to employees’ family capacities, for example, weddings or memorial service functions. Administrators and representatives should have powerful modern administration aptitudes in their associ ation for this necessity, as indicated by Lipman (2013) is a urgent component of guaranteeing great connection among workers and their managers. Kehoe and Alston (2007) include that modern administration offer stage for question the executives inside an association and underlines on the foundation of compelling correspondence directs in an association. In any workplace, there must be issues that request pondering among representatives and their bosses. Henceforth, it is significant for businesses to tune in to workers at whatever point they have issues that call for consideration. The best method of guaranteeing successful correspondence, as per Daft (2008), is the foundation of level correspondence structure that doesn't request progressive conventions. Conventions regularly baffle employees’ endeavors to have administrators tune in to their complaints and along these lines it is reasonable for supervisors to decrease them for correspondence purposes. Bosses and administrato rs should treat their workers in a deferential manner, as they might want to have them treat them back (Doyle 2005). Workers are regularly truly decent people and barely do they affront their directors and bosses. Then again, chiefs and bosses are not regularly aware to workers and they frequently abuse them. This factor necessitates that administrators and representatives be decent people to their subordinates, who for this situation are workers, and treat them in a good manner.Advertising We will compose a custom paper test on Motivating Employees as the First Step to the Organization Growth explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More On the other hand, as per the Lipman (2013), factors that de-inspire representatives incorporate maltreatment of administrative or oversight positions by directors and chiefs over their subordinates. This pattern has an opposite connection with the fifth factor of spurring representatives. This similarity applies in all zones where human r elations apply and particularly in the working conditions. A modest manager coexists well with their subordinates, and then again, a self-important chief consistently has issues with subordinates (Daft 2008). Haughty directors and administrators don't pay attention to issues identified with their subordinates, and consequently subsequently they bother the representatives. On understanding that they disregard their issues, workers will in general utilize other sick instruments for reprisal, which incorporate go-moderate dissenting and striking among others that lead to terrible showing of an association. Consequently, chiefs and managers ought to abstain from manhandling the forces presented to them over the rights and needs of their subordinates. Shallal (2011) noticed that chiefs regularly exploit an effective venture of a worker, which frequently happens in imaginative tasks, whereby representatives work indefatigably in guaranteeing that they build up an item that will flaunt com petiveness an association. After an effective forward leap, the task gets credit and regularly a few chiefs assume acknowledgment as theirs, which should not have a place with them. Willmore (2009) cautions that such an activity is embarrassing and exploitative, and regularly dispirits the representatives consequently they neglect to practice their inventiveness inspired by a paranoid fear of refusal of their credit by their managers. Furthermore, administrators and directors regularly lose temper, subsequently de-rousing their subordinates. Willmore (2009) holds that reliability has a place with the people that are equipped for holding their temper even at troublesome circumstances. Losing temper is an away from of autocracy and pride and in this manner directors and administrators ought to evade it at all expense. It is hard for a person to break new ground subsequent to losing temper and in this manner hard to create answers for the squeezing issues. Workers feel mortified and di scouraged while partner with a tempered supervisor as it is hard to prevail upon the person in question when an issue emerges (Migrant Forum in Asia 2009). The disappointment by directors and chiefs to go to bat for their subordinates or association when under an outer assault causes de-inspiration to employees.Advertising Searching for article on business financial matters? We should check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More Representatives ought to appreciate the assurance of an association gave the danger under inquiry is outside the ability to control of a worker. For example, an association should assume liability of a mishap case including its vehicle, yet not leave it on the hands of the driver. Neglecting to assume liability would de-rouse the driver most exceedingly terrible still the notoriety of an association to people in general. In conclusion, disappointment by administrators and managers to laud their subordinates in the wake of making an excellent showing causes de-inspiration. Kehoe and Alston (2007) set that people like gestures of recognition when it is expected and they make a solid effort to accomplish it at whatever point there is a chance. Working situations offers various open doors for gestures of recognition, and hence representatives buckle down for acclaims from their managers subsequent to making incredible accomplishments. After incredible accomplishments, bosses’ inab ility to perceive and applaud the laborers significantly discourages them most exceedingly terrible despite everything prompts feeling of inadequacy. Accordingly, Podmoroff (2005) demands that it is critical to recognize employeesâ€

IP2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

IP2 - Essay Example One more rule of good dynamic depends on the need to characterize the dynamic procedure. This includes explaining the procedure of tackling the issue and breaking down the degree wherein the issue has been preoccupied (Hurwitz and Hurwitz, 2015). One more rule is that the judgment should be dissected dependent on its devotion particularly as far as issue investigation. The choices caused should communicate to the pioneer as a decent leader that utilizes a target technique for deciding (Peniwati, 2007). Then again, the pioneer should communicate decency in the choice of the most fitting options before settling on an official choices. In the domain of dynamic, different suppositions are made (Martin and Parmar, 2012). Among the suppositions incorporate expecting that ladies are more fragile sexual orientation and that they can't work in indistinguishable jobs from the men in the workplace. This presumption at that point prompts the ladies being given second rate jobs, for example, making espresso, or not utilizing them by any means. Furthermore, the suppositions made with respect to age might be made. The manager may expect that the more established populace can't get a handle on ideas on innovation; in this manner, accept their commitment on issues of innovation. Suppositions may likewise be made on the training levels of the staff. A few heads may expect that people that are not very much learned can't adapt rapidly; along these lines, accept their commitment in the association. To test or affirm the believability of these presumptions, I would survey different elements. For the presumption of the car that the interest for SUVs would proceed on the grounds that gas costs would keep on rising, I would evaluate the logical common sense of the suspicion trying to survey if the supposition broke down the issue being referred to. On the aircrafts supposition that there was a requirement for a carrier that gave no additional courtesies, I would evaluate the reasonableness of the choices made since

Friday, June 26, 2020

Thinking Critically about Military Issues - 1650 Words

Thinking Critically about Military Issues: The Strategist (Essay Sample) Content: Thinking Critically about Military Issues: The StrategistStudent:Professor:Course title:Date:Thinking Critically about Military Issues: The StrategistOf all the Civil War commanders, the Confederate General Robert E. Lee is without doubt one of the most widely respected and one of the most iconic. Even though he was against secession, Robert E. Lee left his job in the United States Army to join the forces of his native state. He then rose to command the biggest Confederate army. General Robert E. Lee repeatedly trounced larger Union armies in the state of Virginia, although his last 2 invasions against the North were not successful (Crocker, 2013). This paper provides a discussion about General Robert E. Lee, a military leader in my area of interest. This selected military leader faced a strategic challenge during a time of conflict in Gettysburg in the year 1863. The Confederate assault of 3rd July 1863, commonly referred to as Picketts Charge, is usually depicted by contemporary historians as an epic and colossal effort of military futility. To General Lee however, the Confederate attack was neither doomed to failure nor was it ill-conceived. After 2 days of intensive combat in the ridges and hills south of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, General Lee hurled his Army of Northern Virginia against the Union center anchored on Cemetery Ridge on the scorching afternoon of 3rd July, 1863 (Barra, 2012). Tactfully flawed but operationally brilliant, the campaign in Gettysburg constituted General Robert Lees concentrated and determined effort aimed at destroying the Union Army of the Potomac on Northern Soil. In essence, the strategic goal of General Robert Lee was to dishearten the Northern supporters of the war so that public opinion would pressurize the administration of President Abraham Lincoln to recognize the Confederate States of America and end the Civil War (Savage, 2014).General Robert Lees Strategic ReassessmentCarter and Dozier (2014) stated tha t the war in Gettysburg started on 1st July 1863 as a meeting engagement when Union cavalry under the leadership of John Buford encountered Confederate infantry from Ambrose Hills corps on the ridges northwest of the small town of Gettysburg in central Pennsylvania. General Lee, hoping to make the most of his capacity to bring more reinforcements to the field before George Meade could counter in more strength, accepted the fight although, as he stated, he was marching blind because J.E.B. Stuarts cavalry was absent (Carter Dozier, 2014). It is of note that General Lees gamble on 1st July 1863 actually paid off as converging Confederate columns managed to smash 2 Union corps by late afternoon and the Union Army moved back to Cemetery Hill south of Gettysburg. On 2nd July 1863, General Robert Lee planned to attack both sides of the Army of the Potomac at the same time but he failed in coordinating the assaults.Following some of the fiercest combating of the war, Meade maintained the high ground from Little Round Top through Cemetery Ridge to Culps Hill by the end of the day. Moreover, by the days end on July 2 1863, the dilemma that confronted General Robert Lee was knowing whether he had come up with a good strategy whose execution was poor, or whether the strategy itself was actually flawed (Field Hook, 2010). As General Lee assessed the field, he came to believe that, had James Longstreets attack against Meades southern flank been coordinated with fellow corps commander Richard Ewells assault against the northern extremity of the Union line on Culps Hill, then the Confederates would have easily defeated the Army of the Potomac. Notwithstanding the lack of coordination, for which General Robert Lee should bear full responsibility, he had nearly attained success since the Army of Northern Virginias subordinate commanders at the division and brigade level were highly competent and the infantry was very skilled. Petruzzi (2013) pointed out that his army had alm ost penetrated the Union line on Cemetery Ridge in 2 places before the Union reinforcements and artillery exploited the interior lines thereby repelling the Confederate forces. General Robert Lee believed that if he could coordinate the assault the next day, July 3rd, he could actually force the Army of the Potomac out of the field. In addition, for the very first time in this fighting, he had his whole army on the field before the end of the second day, July 2nd. Stuart came back with his reduced horsemen by early evening and by late afternoon, George Picketts fresh division of about 4,480 Virginians arrived on the combat zone and was ready for action on 3rd July, 1863 (History, 2009).In spite of General Robert Lees own admission that he was far less positive of his armys likelihood of victory compared to the previous day, he still went ahead for battle when he actually did not have to and Longstreet had suggested a reasonable alternative to a frontal attack against the Army of the Potomac. The only imaginable reason as to why he chose to override James Longstreets suggestion to leave Gettysburg and battle a defensive war nearer to Washington, D. C., is that he thought his side would be victorious at Gettysburg (Kingseed, 2013). In the mind of General Robert Lee, the decision was never whether he would retreat or attack, or whether he would not stay or he would stay. He actually had those decisions the moment he agreed to the fighting on 1st July 1863. Only by offensive action could he accomplish his intention of destroying the Union Army and he would not move back whilst any opportunity for success remained (Kingseed, 2013). Understanding that the Southern states would never have an adequate amount of resources to mount a successive invasion against the Northern states and that time was in fact working against the Confederacy, General Robert Lee chose to assault again. In essence, General Lee was not playing to avoid defeat, but rather to win. For him to acc omplish complete victory, he was ready to risk total defeat (Mowday, 2013). General Robert Lee created the conditions for successHaving decided to remain on the battlefield and launch a major attack, General Robert Lee directed his efforts toward creating the conditions that were favorable to victory. At first, he placed James Longstreet in command of the general attack. Longstreet is considered to have been a poor choice given that he was strongly against the attack, although General Robert Lee thought that he was the best available corps commander now that Stonewall Jackson was dead (Kingseed, 2013). There was no other commander whom he would have picked to lead the attack other than Longstreet. The available alternatives who included Stuart, Hill, or Ewell had never proven their ability to match the ability of James Longstreet in delivering the hammer-like attack that was needed on the third day, 3rd July 1863. Next, General Robert Lee directed a strong 2-hour artillery prepar ation aimed at softening the Union center before the infantry began its assault. Had the bombardment made by the Confederate torn down the Union artillery, then the infantry could have crossed the no-mans land which divided the Confederate and the Union lines with negligible casualties. Moreover, General Robert Lee commanded Stuart to surround the Northern right flank and attack the Army of the Potomacs rear (Rafuse, 2008). Under Brigadier Generals George Custer and David Gregg, the Union cavalry stopped Stuarts assault 3 miles short of Cemetery Ridge, thereby fighting an extensive and strategically crucial battle. The fatigue of his horse and the casualties served to force Stuart to leave the field without accomplishing his goal and go back to the Confederate lines (Rafuse, 2008). Equally important, General Robert Lee used every available resource in the assault 3 divisions of roughly 12, 000 men in total and concentrated the attack against a short stretch of line along Cemetery Ridge. He also prepared 2 more brigades of infantry to support any infiltration of the Union line. It is of note that such as attack would have offered General Robert Lee numerical advantage at the point of assault (Mowday, 2013). Looking back, General Robert Lees judgment appears flawed although his command method had always been to bring his army to the battlefield, create the conditions for success, and ...

Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Will a High School Part-time Job Help With College Admissions

Managing Editor of Peterson's & EssayEdge, Guest Contributor Whether theyï ¿ ½re saving for college or just looking to earn some pocket change, high school students should put a lot of thought into choosing part-time employment. Although it may seem like just a few insignificant hours per week, a part-time job can have a big impact on a studentï ¿ ½s college application and could even influence their career path for years to come. To determine their job search criteria, students should consider four key questions, making sure to answer ï ¿ ½yesï ¿ ½ at least once for any job they consider. Answer ï ¿ ½yesï ¿ ½ to all four? Sounds like a winner! 1. Does the company directly or indirectly offer scholarships and/or grants? Many national and international businesses often offer scholarships to employees. Companies are proud of the scholarships that they offer, and you can typically find out more information online. Be sure to check if students must remain employed while in college in order to use the scholarship. Also, read the requirements to see if recipients are required to pursue a specific major or area of study to continue receiving the scholarship. Students who are interested in a job with a smaller firm or organization may want to ask if the business itself offers scholarships or if there are scholarships available through related professional organizations. 2. Is the job in the studentï ¿ ½s area of interest? Meeting this criteria can seem impossible to many high school students. How can someone get a job in their area of interest when they havenï ¿ ½t even started college? While it can be a reach, taking the extra time to find a part-time job in their field of interest can be deeply rewarding. Students will meet other people who share their interests and who can offer pro tips on getting through college. Even a job that is in a similar field but doesnï ¿ ½t offer the highest pay or requires grunt work can be better than a job that isnï ¿ ½t going to benefit a studentï ¿ ½s ultimate career path. Itï ¿ ½s far more motivating to know that their efforts will pay off down the road. 3. Will this job result in an expanded network? The saying goes, ï ¿ ½Itï ¿ ½s not what you know but whom.ï ¿ ½ While you do need the right set of knowledge and skills, the saying is right in that only other people can champion you and promote you. If students canï ¿ ½t secure a job in their area of interest, it can be exceptionally useful to work with people who can help connect them with professionals in the field ï ¿ ½ they may even be able to offer strong letters of recommendation. 4. Does the job offer the chance to learn auxiliary skills? Perhaps with the exception of assembly line workers, nobody does only one thing during the course of their workday. For the position in question, can a student learn and apply auxiliary skills that are important to their future career? For example, working in a bakery can help someone interested in graphic design to build skills regarding interacting with clients and marketing unique designs. Ryan Hickey is the Managing Editor of Peterson's & EssayEdge and is an expert in many aspects of college, graduate, and professional admissions. A graduate of Yale University, Ryan has worked in various admissions capacities for nearly a decade, including writing test-prep material for the SAT, AP exams, and TOEFL, editing essays and personal statements, and consulting directly with applicants. Managing Editor of Peterson's & EssayEdge, Guest Contributor Whether theyï ¿ ½re saving for college or just looking to earn some pocket change, high school students should put a lot of thought into choosing part-time employment. Although it may seem like just a few insignificant hours per week, a part-time job can have a big impact on a studentï ¿ ½s college application and could even influence their career path for years to come. To determine their job search criteria, students should consider four key questions, making sure to answer ï ¿ ½yesï ¿ ½ at least once for any job they consider. Answer ï ¿ ½yesï ¿ ½ to all four? Sounds like a winner! 1. Does the company directly or indirectly offer scholarships and/or grants? Many national and international businesses often offer scholarships to employees. Companies are proud of the scholarships that they offer, and you can typically find out more information online. Be sure to check if students must remain employed while in college in order to use the scholarship. Also, read the requirements to see if recipients are required to pursue a specific major or area of study to continue receiving the scholarship. Students who are interested in a job with a smaller firm or organization may want to ask if the business itself offers scholarships or if there are scholarships available through related professional organizations. 2. Is the job in the studentï ¿ ½s area of interest? Meeting this criteria can seem impossible to many high school students. How can someone get a job in their area of interest when they havenï ¿ ½t even started college? While it can be a reach, taking the extra time to find a part-time job in their field of interest can be deeply rewarding. Students will meet other people who share their interests and who can offer pro tips on getting through college. Even a job that is in a similar field but doesnï ¿ ½t offer the highest pay or requires grunt work can be better than a job that isnï ¿ ½t going to benefit a studentï ¿ ½s ultimate career path. Itï ¿ ½s far more motivating to know that their efforts will pay off down the road. 3. Will this job result in an expanded network? The saying goes, ï ¿ ½Itï ¿ ½s not what you know but whom.ï ¿ ½ While you do need the right set of knowledge and skills, the saying is right in that only other people can champion you and promote you. If students canï ¿ ½t secure a job in their area of interest, it can be exceptionally useful to work with people who can help connect them with professionals in the field ï ¿ ½ they may even be able to offer strong letters of recommendation. 4. Does the job offer the chance to learn auxiliary skills? Perhaps with the exception of assembly line workers, nobody does only one thing during the course of their workday. For the position in question, can a student learn and apply auxiliary skills that are important to their future career? For example, working in a bakery can help someone interested in graphic design to build skills regarding interacting with clients and marketing unique designs. Ryan Hickey is the Managing Editor of Peterson's & EssayEdge and is an expert in many aspects of college, graduate, and professional admissions. A graduate of Yale University, Ryan has worked in various admissions capacities for nearly a decade, including writing test-prep material for the SAT, AP exams, and TOEFL, editing essays and personal statements, and consulting directly with applicants.